Bedrock Divorce Advisors
Archive for April, 2011
Are Divorced Parents Required to Pay for their Children’s College Education?
Child support payments generally stop when children reach the “age of emancipation.” In most states, that age is between 18 and 21. But what obligations do parents have to pay for their children’s college education?
Whether divorced parents have a legal obligation to pay for their children’s education depends on the state in which the divorce occurred.
The following states have laws that allow courts to order the non-custodial parent to help pay for college (depending on the state, the cost of college may include, tuition, room and board, books, extracurricular activities and a monthly allowance); Alabama, Arizona, Colorado, Connecticut, District of Columbia, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, New Jersey, New York, North Dakota, Oregon, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Utah, Washington and West Virginia.
Alaska, Nebraska and New Hampshire currently have laws on the books that prohibit the courts from ordering college support, except in those cases where the parents had a previous agreement.
Even in the states that don’t require paying for college expenses, courts recognize the need for children to have a college education. Therefore, they can allow the issue to be included in the divorce settlement agreement, including the amount and term of alimony to be paid.
The best way to deal with this during your divorce is to negotiate a written college support agreement in addition to any other child support agreements.
A college support agreement should include:
• What percentage of college expenses each parent is responsible for
• How many semesters of support will be provided
• Any limits on yearly payments
• Whether or not there is an age limit for the child to attend
• Any restrictions on which college the child should attend
• If there should be a minimum GPA
• Exactly what expenses will be covered
Alternatively, if there are many years remaining before the children start college, it might be preferable to negotiate a lump sum payment up front assuming there are sufficient assets available to do this. Since you never know what can happen over a long period of time – your ex-husband can die or go bankrupt – a bird in hand might be just the way to go.
However, ascertaining the future costs of college can be very difficult, especially if the children are still young. Unfortunately, most divorce attorneys don’t have the training or expertise to compute complex projections of future college costs and what the present value of those future costs would be in today’s dollars. That’s just one of many reasons why you should consult with one of our Divorce Financial Strategists™.
All content on this site/blog is for informational purposes only, and does not constitute legal advice. If you require legal advice, retain a lawyer licensed in your jurisdiction. The opinions expressed are solely those of the author, who is not an attorney.
Divorce and Your Grandmother’s Diamond Ring
During divorce there are so many things to divide with your husband that you may have forgotten all about the diamond ring your grandmother gave you many years ago. But when you finally get around to thinking about it, it hits you like a ton of bricks.
Can my husband take my grandmother’s diamond ring in our divorce?
Most likely he can’t. That’s because that diamond ring would be considered your separate property. It was a gift or inheritance given to only you by someone who is not your spouse. (For a more extensive discussion on the differences between separate and marital property, please see my Huffington Post article). The only way there might be an issue, is if you used marital funds to repair the ring, replace a missing diamond, or somehow increased the ring’s value. If marital funds were used to increase the value of the ring, it may still be considered your separate property, but the increase in value may be considered marital property. That increase in value would then be thrown into the pot with all of the other marital assets.
On the other hand, all gifts that your husband gave you after you were married (and that you gave him) for anniversaries, birthdays, etc., are considered marital property and they would also be part of that pot of assets that gets divided. I know that seems unfair, but that’s the law.
However, any gifts that you received from your husband before your marriage, including your engagement ring, would be considered, in most cases, your separate property, since you received them while you were still single.
The bottom line is that you should never commingle your separate property with marital property. Then, if you should later divorce, there would be no question about what is rightfully yours. Another way to decide what should be separate property and what should be marital property is through a prenuptial or postnuptial agreement. (For a more detailed discussion on this, please see my Huffington Post article.)
If you are getting divorced, or thinking about it, and have questions about how your family heirlooms and other assets might be affected, please contact us. One of our Divorce Financial Strategists™ will help you protect what is rightfully yours.
All content on this site/blog is for informational purposes only, and does not constitute legal advice. If you require legal advice, retain a lawyer licensed in your jurisdiction. The opinions expressed are solely those of the author, who is not an attorney.
Recent Comments